As jobs go being the Cabinet Secretary for Finance isn’t
easy. Running a devolved budget when the UK Government is slashing public
spending is probably one of the most thankless tasks around. So no one was
expecting very much when John Swinney presented the Scottish Government’s draft budget yesterday. And we were not disappointed.
While John Swinney does exhibit some dangerous neo-liberal
economic tendencies, his belief in the Laffer curve for instance, he clearly
doesn’t believe that cutting spending in the teeth of the longest and deepest
recession since the 1930’s is a good idea. In that he is of course correct and
in very good company. Not Arthur Laffer on this occasion!
So he didn’t have much to play with and he tried to argue
that what he did have was going to boost the economy. Some shift from revenue
to capital, small boosts to enterprise and tourism budgets, renewable energy
projects and the like. None of which are likely to offset the overall effect of
an 18% cut in public spending since 2009/10. There are some welcome increases
in housing and college budgets, but this is only a partial replacement for over
cutting in these areas last year. Other small projects are mainly cosmetic,
giving ministers something to announce, probably several times, in the coming
year.
At least the budget does have a narrative, unlike some other
budget responses. Willie Rennie’s best shot was to privatise Scottish Water at
the bargain price of £1.5bn. As the assets are probably worth over £20bn, this
is selling off the family silver big time. Even this paltry sum would go out of
Scotland to his pal in the Treasury. He was joined in this lunacy by CBI Scotland
who argued for more privatisation, on a day when we had further scandalous revelations
about G4S’s behaviour in Scotland.
The media coverage has focused on his pay policy. “George Osborne
in a kilt”, as one of my trade union colleagues put it. It is certainly the
case that he has largely followed the Treasury lead on pay in recent years. When
John Swinney describes 1% as modest, no one can accuse him of exaggeration! In
fairness he can point to the limited no compulsory redundancy guarantee and the
Scottish Living Wage, but the social wage argument is very weak. A regressive Council
Tax freeze is a poor use of resources. The living wage point would also be
stronger if he did more on procurement.
The problem is that his pay policy only covers a small
number of public sector workers. The largest groups are either covered by UK
pay bodies, like the NHS, or local government. That’s why his budget allocation
for local government is more important to those workers than his pay policy. CoSLA,
with some justification, argues that local government is taking the bulk of the
spending cuts and this impacts on their ability to pay even the ‘modest’ pay
policy. For example, low paid council workers haven’t even been paid the paltry
£250 in the past two years. There is no redundancy guarantee here either.
So despite the best spinning efforts there is little in this
budget for jobs and growth. Further public sector jobs will be lost in the
coming year and for every one of those there is a consequential private sector
job loss. Real wage cuts, for the third successive year, will further dent
consumer confidence. These cuts are the primary reason this recession has been
so long and so deep.
We can and should criticise the Scottish Government for some
poor choices in the allocation of this budget. However, never forget that the
root cause is the ideological attack on public services by the ConDem
coalition. Yesterday’s budget is another reason to be marching in Glasgow on 20 October.
George Osborne in a kilt is a bit unfair. I appreciate from UNISON's point of view the underpinning and no compulsory redundancy guarantee doesn't apply to most members, but the Living Wage has made more progress in Scotland than in England. It's not much, but at least shows willing given the constraints Osborne has placed on budget allocations.
ReplyDelete