Today's
news that the Scottish and UK governments have done a deal over the s30 order
means that the debate can move on from the procedural to the substantive issues
of constitutional change.
While
I would have liked the opportunity to work towards a second question, no one
was under any illusion how difficult it was going to be work up a consensus
option. A vote for 16 and 17 year olds is clearly right as they will have to
live with the decision longer than the rest of us. Anyone who has canvassed on
the doorstep knows that age does not define political awareness. The pivotal
role for the Electoral Commission puts a strong independent oversight on the
whole process.
For
those in the Better Together campaign a single question is welcome as they view
this as a straightforward argument between independence, or separation as they
put it, and what?
For
some in the Better Together campaign it is primarily the status quo as defined
by the latest Scotland Act. For others, who support greater devolution, the
challenge is to define a 'no' vote as a vote for a different constitutional
settlement for Scotland. One advantage of the lengthy run in to the referendum
is that it gives time to develop different approaches for Scotland.
Independence won’t be defined until the Scottish Government publishes its White
Paper in November 2013. The Liberal Democrats plan to publish their ideas soon
and Scottish Labour's Devolution Commission will present an interim report to
next April's party conference.
Other
groups have an important role to play in developing these options. It is
particularly important to develop approaches that challenge the neo-liberal
consensus that drives so much economic policy in Scotland and the UK. The RedPaper Collective seeks to do just that and expect more from us in the coming
months.
No comments:
Post a Comment