Well that’s the Scottish leadership election over. There was at least a real debate about ideas and
strategy and Neil Findlay’s campaign ensured that we didn’t get the coronation
the system usually delivers. Neil also delivered ideas of substance and
generated energy amongst party members that I haven’t seen for a long time.
From Jim Murphy’s
initial announcements it would appear that we are about to get some internal
constitutional change.
Jim wants a ‘Clause
4’ moment, although it’s actually Clause 2 in the Scottish Labour Party rules. Yes,
I know I’m a pedant. Not in this case for some New Labour policy purpose, but
to bring Scottish Labour ‘closer to the
centre of Scottish life’. The strategy appears to be aimed at dispelling
the myths about ‘London Labour’, stoked by the actions of the UK party during
Johann Lamont’s leadership.
Many in the party
will welcome this strategy as long overdue. Even in government there was an
unwillingness to shout about the different approaches we took in Scotland in
areas like the NHS and education policy. If a Scottish solution to Scottish
issues is to mean anything, then differentiation is fine.
He set out five principles for this new aims and values statement.
The new Jim starts
by using the ‘s’ word. Socialism isn’t something he talks a lot about, so
that’s a positive start. The new socialism is to be linked with patriotism because
our, “political faith grew
out of something deeper which is ingrained in our Scottish character”. This
is apparently, “A belief that we stand together,
look after those who need our help, and make sure that everyone gets a fair
shout”. I'm not sure that these are uniquely Scottish characteristics, even if
the examples are Burns poetry, highland clearances and New Lanark. Welsh Labour might take issue with us claiming Robert Owen as our own, he was after all Welsh
– but we get the drift.
Then we get a bit about solidarity across the UK that
is complementary to and not in conflict with the Scottish national interest. He
says, “We will declare ourselves a party
that represents Scotland first, in the community of the UK and the world, and
where, as Scots, we work with others to achieve the potential of all”. That seems a reasonable position
for a party of devolution to take.
He then asserts, “the
total devolution of policy making in devolved areas”. Impossible to
disagree with, as the existing Clause 15 already delivers precisely that. Recent
policy disagreements with the UK party have been over reserved issues like the
Bedroom Tax.
His fourth principle seeks to commit Labour to a “permanent and powerful Scottish Parliament”. Given the somewhat lukewarm commitment of a
few Westminster MPs over the years, this is an eminently sensible approach and in keeping with the founding principles of Scottish Labour.
Finally, we get the big policy vision; “we will renew our historic mission for a
more equal and fairer society where power, wealth and opportunity are more
fairly shared amongst our fellow Scots and our fellow human beings around the
world”. I might question the ‘more fairly’ as a bit weak, but again the
direction of travel is fine.
As a trade union official, I am all too familiar with
the new CEO arriving with a glossy new mission statement. It’s a tried and
tested management strategy aimed at setting a new tone and direction. As
Scottish Labour members are fed up with the ‘London Labour’ label, most will be
willing to give this approach a fair wind. A draft in January for consultation
will give an opportunity to turn some of the more esoteric phrases into meaningful language.
Jim ended his speech in very unNew Labour style, by
taking us back into Labour history. To the 1888 founding conference of the
Scottish Labour Party no less. His speechwriter should perhaps have checked
with the Keir Hardie society, because the great man didn’t actually chair that
conference, even though he was the driving force behind it. It was chaired by
RB Cunninghame Graham who of course went on to be the first President of the
SNP - so maybe he was best air brushed out on this occasion!
Jim was however a bit selective in his list of
Scottish Labour policy during this period. The founding programme also included
the nationalisation of the railways and other means of transit (waterways and
tramways) the banks, the land, all mineral rights and the abolition of the
House of Lords and all hereditary offices. Now that’s a real Clause 4 moment!
Overall, the aim of emphasising the
‘Scottish’ in the Scottish Labour Party is not a bad strategy as long as we
don’t lose the socialism with the patriotism. Because it is socialism that
distinguishes Labour from other social democratic parties and we should never
forget that.
More fair. A bit more? A wee bit more? This is anaemic rubbish which will persuade no-one. As for the flag wrapping notion of patriotism, that strikes completely the wrong note. The Yes campaign wasn't about this kind of jingoism. He is a shallow and ilunconvincing careerist. His role with the Henry Jackson Society is a disgrace. As a trade unionist I can't go on with this charade any longer. Leaving the party asap.
ReplyDelete